Re: V 2.4.x schema extensions

[Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>]

On 10/5/11 8:21 AM, Brett @Google wrote:
>   In the objectclass schema definition you must have one of MAY or MUST,
> otherwise there are no attributes considered legal by adding your
> supplimentary objectclass to an object, it wont affect what attributes are
> considered valid (valid attributes in your case are determined by the
> superset attributes which are allowed by the other objectclass values).
>
> The MAY attribute you commented out does not look valid, IMHO.. from the
> shipped schemas :
>
> objectclass     ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.2.2
>      NAME 'inetOrgPerson'
>          DESC 'RFC2798: Internet Organizational Person'
>      SUP organizationalPerson
>      STRUCTURAL
>          MAY (
>                  audio $ businessCategory $ carLicense $ departmentNumber $
>                  displayName $ employeeNumber $ employeeType $ givenName $
>                  homePhone $ homePostalAddress $ initials $ jpegPhoto $
>                  labeledURI $ mail $ manager $ mobile $ o $ pager $
>                  photo $ roomNumber $ secretary $ uid $ userCertificate $
>                  x500uniqueIdentifier $ preferredLanguage $
>                  userSMIMECertificate $ userPKCS12 )
>          )
>
> The first character after MAY should be "(" with a dollar delimited list of
> allowed attribute names, with a closing ")"
No. If you have one value only, you don't need to add the '(' and ')'.

Have you tried to declare the AttributeType *before* the ObjectClass 
which uses it ?

--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel LÃcharny
www.iktek.com