[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDAP proxy with back_ldap: (?=undefined)

To: "Torsten Schlabach (Tascel eG)" <tschlabach@tascel.net>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: LDAP proxy with back_ldap: (?=undefined)
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:55:13 -0700
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <c14fcacac641835f6c79ac312cb7b6cc@imap.tascel.net>
References: <c14fcacac641835f6c79ac312cb7b6cc@imap.tascel.net>

--On Monday, September 12, 2011 6:37 PM +0000 "Torsten Schlabach (TasceleG)" <tschlabach@tascel.net> wrote:

Any idea?

Your schemas have to match. ?=undefined means that you are sending inattributes that the server knows nothing about.


--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LDAP proxy with back_ldap: (?=undefined)
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- LDAP proxy with back_ldap: (?=undefined)
  - From: "Torsten Schlabach (Tascel eG)" <tschlabach@tascel.net>

Prev by Date: LDAP proxy with back_ldap: (?=undefined)
Next by Date: Re: LDAP proxy with back_ldap: (?=undefined)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread