[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Status of persistent search in OpenLDAP

To: Clément OUDOT <clem.oudot@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of persistent search in OpenLDAP
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:41:59 +0200
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <CAK_oV48y0DwAJ9EL4s81RuqP+74XBZCKHs4MKGD8FBWm6oDdnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK_oV48y0DwAJ9EL4s81RuqP+74XBZCKHs4MKGD8FBWm6oDdnw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110813 Firefox/6.0 SeaMonkey/2.3

Clément OUDOT wrote:
> I tried to know if the persistent search control (OID
> 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.3) was supported in OpenLDAP. The latests
> messages I read were saying "no", as we can see in this discussion:
> http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201008/msg00246.html

draft-ietf-ldapext-psearch is not supported in OpenLDAP. This standard has
serious deficiencies anyway making it almost unusable. I know what I'm talking
about since I have to use that with eDirectory in a customer project.

> But this blog entry is saying this control was introduced in OpenLDAP
> 2.2: http://www.connexitor.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=112

This mentions syncrepl (see RFC 4533) as noted in this blog entry.

Ciao, Michael.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Status of persistent search in OpenLDAP
  - From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>

References:
- Status of persistent search in OpenLDAP
  - From: Clément OUDOT <clem.oudot@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Status of persistent search in OpenLDAP
Next by Date: Re: Status of persistent search in OpenLDAP
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread