[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Version

To: Friedrich Locke <friedrich.locke@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Version
From: Zdenek Styblik <stybla@turnovfree.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 20:56:56 +0200
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <CANMDHqf7wj9ZRfFjvFmmbGOkJN79nskGN2yjQCwPrGq9X12Hqg@mail.gmail.com>
Openpgp: url=http://stinkfoot.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=Styblik
Organization: OS TurnovFree.net
References: <CANMDHqf7wj9ZRfFjvFmmbGOkJN79nskGN2yjQCwPrGq9X12Hqg@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/3.1.11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/29/11 20:42, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> hi folks,
> 
> i just wonder what are the most common versions of openldap you have
> running on production systems right now.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 

Hello,

anything from 2.4 series and as close as possible to the latest released
version. This is one approach.

The another, which might look more stable and what-not, is to run 2.3
series included in eg. RH, I think. However you're at risk running into
old bugs and you won't get any, or almost zero, support regarding such
old release.

Development of OpenLDAP is quite fast with all the risks this approach
tags along.

My $0.02 USD.

Regards,
Z.

- -- 
Zdenek Styblik
email: stybla@turnovfree.net
jabber: stybla@jabber.turnovfree.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk4zAngACgkQ8MreUbSH7iny8ACfSw3b1sTG9lmblN5VQ6QfeaGR
vBsAnjTWC0nROsUDm5qoBnv1D0YflonT
=M2VU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Next by Date: syncrepl: consumer state is newer than provider
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread