[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Excessive logging at stats loglevel: any useful alternative to none?

To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Excessive logging at stats loglevel: any useful alternative to none?
From: Nick Urbanik <nick.urbanik@optusnet.com.au>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:14:05 +1000
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <20110728005220.GB9488@nick.optusnet.com.au>
References: <20110728005220.GB9488@nick.optusnet.com.au>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On 28/07/11 10:52 +1000, Nick Urbanik wrote:

We want *some* logging, but we don't want too much.  Can anyone
suggest a useful log level here?

It would be great to have some control over the verbosity of logging
of each subsystem; for example, we cannot log any information about
syncrepl, as that would totally fill our disks.


Silly me, syslog.conf was accepting debug level.  At .info it is okay.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Nick Urbanik http://nicku.org 808-71011 nick.urbanik@optusnet.com.au
GPG: 7FFA CDC7 5A77 0558 DC7A 790A 16DF EC5B BB9D 2C24  ID: BB9D2C24
I disclaim, therefore I am.

References:
- Excessive logging at stats loglevel: any useful alternative to none?
  - From: Nick Urbanik <nick.urbanik@optusnet.com.au>

Prev by Date: Excessive logging at stats loglevel: any useful alternative to none?
Next by Date: RE: SlapD is using more CPU
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread