Re: exact/base

To: Andrew Findlay <andrew.findlay@skills-1st.co.uk>

Subject: Re: exact/base

From: Benjamin Griese <der.darude@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:20:45 +0200

Cc: Friedrich Locke <friedrich.locke@gmail.com>, openldap-technical@openldap.org

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=a6XWdjDOr/+lekjNQD0iMS0hEiP/YZfqnB347uh7GVg=; b=nu1KA0d7Xt5tXBokfh4FkM3vl4X7j541/mltBFARS3WOeMe/7Szt+Mi3FbbVX3tBut OyQlZ0YPMgERXfnH2zclDSLTqutaD8LIJJR79K4F9xHp8A7qJWD/NU3O64p4eKTJe32N xYDmdQvEetEEdfq9kl76pca9iJOcICjK07A4c=

In-reply-to: <20110708151300.GF23172@slab.skills-1st.co.uk>

References: <CANMDHqfV44PjNakgPGran+yDP1HdEJSyNkyk04g1dofHgqoiEw@mail.gmail.com> <20110708151300.GF23172@slab.skills-1st.co.uk>

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 17:13, Andrew Findlay <andrew.findlay@skills-1st.co.uk> wrote:

On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:52:45AM -0300, Friedrich Locke wrote:

> may someone here explain me the difference between dn.exact and dn.base ?

There is no difference. All of these have the same meaning, for
historical reasons:

exact
base
baseobject

Andrew
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| From Andrew Findlay, Skills 1st Ltd |
| Consultant in large-scale systems, networks, and directory services |
| http://www.skills-1st.co.uk/ +44 1628 782565 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

References:

exact/base
- From: Friedrich Locke <friedrich.locke@gmail.com>
Re: exact/base
- From: Andrew Findlay <andrew.findlay@skills-1st.co.uk>