[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: slapd "vs." db_archive

To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: slapd "vs." db_archive
From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:01:15 +0200
Cc: Peter Palmreuther <pitpalme+openldap@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <8DE75800-F9C0-47D1-BBE3-A87B20D22950@gmail.com>
References: <8DE75800-F9C0-47D1-BBE3-A87B20D22950@gmail.com>
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.33.7-desktop-2.1mnb; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; )

On Thursday, 23 June 2011 16:19:45 Peter Palmreuther wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I tried to use 'db_archive' to figure, which of those many log.* files
> already accumulated I can safely remove. Unluckily it didn't print any
> name, albeit there're 170 file and according to 'fuser log.*' only the
> last one is held open by a process (the slapd one).
> 
> After restarting slapd db_archive prints 169 file names, to be precise all
> but the last.

What is your 'checkpoint' or 'olcDbCheckPoint' setting for this OpenLDAP 
"database" ?

Regards,
Buchan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: slapd "vs." db_archive
  - From: Peter Palmreuther <pitpalme+openldap@gmail.com>

References:
- slapd "vs." db_archive
  - From: Peter Palmreuther <pitpalme+openldap@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: slapd "vs." db_archive
Next by Date: [SOLVED] olcDbCacheSize: no equality matching rule
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread