Mar 23 17:27:50 ldaprelay slapd[4358]: slapd stopped.
Mar 23 17:34:45 ldaprelay slapd[4577]: @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.4.24 (Mar 23
2011 16:52:04)
$#012#011root@ldaprelay.univ-amu.fr:/usr/local/src/openldap-2.4.24/servers/slapd
Mar 23 17:34:45 ldaprelay slapd[4579]: slapd starting
Mar 23 17:34:45 ldaprelay slapd[4579]: do_syncrep2: rid=040
LDAP_RES_INTERMEDIATE - REFRESH_DELETE
Mar 23 17:34:45 ldaprelay slapd[4579]: do_syncrep2: rid=020
LDAP_RES_INTERMEDIATE - SYNC_ID_SET
Mar 23 17:34:48 ldaprelay slapd[4579]: last message repeated 175 times
Mar 23 17:34:48 ldaprelay slapd[4579]: do_syncrep2: rid=020
LDAP_RES_INTERMEDIATE - REFRESH_PRESENT
Mar 23 17:34:48 ldaprelay slapd[4579]: do_syncrep2: rid=020
cookie=rid=020,sid=020,csn=20110323163416.105518Z#000000#020#000000
Mar 23 17:34:48 ldaprelay slapd[4579]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x1a35560
20110323163416.105518Z#000000#020#000000
Mar 23 17:34:48 ldaprelay slapd[4579]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing
0x1a35620 20110323163416.105518Z#000000#020#000000
I changed the provider to 2.4.24 that makes deletes. Hopefully this one was
built on tar.gz
That makes no difference, after restarting the consumer, it does not delete
extra entries
Dom
2011/3/23 LALOT Dominique <dom.lalot@gmail.com <mailto:dom.lalot@gmail.com>>
Hi Howard,
We were told to migrate to 2.4.23 sometimes ago, and we did some work to
update our production servers. Can I try 2.4.24 only on the consumer side?
It would be a pain to migrate all servers to 2.4.24 without package.
is this related to the last fixes?
Fixed slapd syncrepl reuse of presence list (ITS#6707)
Fixed slapd syncrepl uninitialized return code (ITS#6719)
Fixed slapd syncrepl variable initialization (ITS#6739)
Fixed slapd syncrepl refresh to use complete cookie (ITS#6807)
Thanks
Dom
2011/3/23 Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com <mailto:hyc@symas.com>>
LALOT Dominique wrote:
Hello,
I am testing the replication feature in a multimaster environment
replicating
into a single database. As stated before, I added serverid to my
providers. I
just have two providers for test purpose.
I tested mass updates on a provider, stopped my replica during
updates, then
start again and it's OK, it updates the entries
If I do the same for mass deletes. I deleted 40000 entries while
stopping the
consumer. My consumer is still with 30000 undeleted entries. I
left the
consumer for hours, restarting it twice.
It seems there is no regular compare between consumer or provider
in such
situation. I'll simplify to test in a single provider setup, to
see if it works.
All servers are 2.4.23
Please try your test with 2.4.24 instead.