[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: using of shared memory with slapadd
- To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Subject: Re: using of shared memory with slapadd
- From: tim stone <timstone10001@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:36:38 +0100
- Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MwKriZ8s0bSGKpmsY8m9gAX9fbCQ7ont1Z49uqtR9dM=; b=k6Cd1q7Aovj4NkZ8hTLmpAO+32YY4597b81lkwMM+TaLK1JzJ0NR8yimXcWH86+Wug PVBpcg3BU1THkQh3bU0tV5W37wAiBA4tUYijQp5RIRqG1zWyengwxiCIfkMR6mdVhWDQ Z+7u3vy0BdEGZOaNf3k6Itkm4sM+kDjjZ6oGk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XzdqoTE2GsFgNI/CEiJf3QIw5LqX9+zZb/eNNUGuxVq0osm6764tuYGKHt3/6HtERv U5zgvU/qPqq+2gQPZpsBYRN7M4s58Bb3tgB1X2Ls2QFEzZIivxG73ZW0xAnVtSDn8e84 G3W4fLSw44Z3oYTNYae3A+GONm7mqnJzUriZU=
- In-reply-to: <EDB22E504A814F7FBF974FC1@192.168.1.2>
- References: <AANLkTimB4KjUmqhey=vUcgRowB3tvEDjAqdnL42Rw3eu@mail.gmail.com> <EDB22E504A814F7FBF974FC1@192.168.1.2>
> Run slapadd as the same user that slapd runs as. This is no different than
> running slapadd without shared memory segments, where you will have the same
> issue with the created BDB caching files (i.e., same results whether it is
> in memory or on disk).
>
Thanks, yes you are right. This issue I've never seen on my server,
because SuSE automatically makes
automaticly (via start script) a chown in the different backend
database directorys ...
Thanks Steeg