[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: rfc2307bis and samba woes

To: Victor Mataré <matare@lih.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: rfc2307bis and samba woes
From: ITPFS oota <t-oota@dh.jp.nec.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:59:28 +0900
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <201009290150.59964.matare@lih.rwth-aachen.de>
References: <201009290150.59964.matare@lih.rwth-aachen.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 01:50:59AM +0200, Victor Mataré wrote:

> openSuSE, who allegedly use it by default. No idea how they made samba work 
> with it, though. In my naïve mind the patch should be almost trivial (just use 
> groupOfNames as structuralObjectClass and add a dummy member), but I suspect 
> it's not in vanilla samba because of the vague status of rfc2307bis. So... any 
> insight on this whole rfc2307bis scenario is highly appreciated.

Please see samba bug #4597

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4597

OpenSUSE 11.2 patch was already posted.

--
--- Oota Toshiya ---  t-oota at dh.jp.nec.com
NEC Systems Software Operations Unit      Shiba,Minato,Tokyo
IT Platform Solutions Division            Japan,Earth,Solar system
(samba-jp/ldap-jp Staff,mutt-j/samba-jp postmaster)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rfc2307bis and samba woes
  - From: Victor Mataré <matare@lih.rwth-aachen.de>

References:
- rfc2307bis and samba woes
  - From: Victor Mataré <matare@lih.rwth-aachen.de>

Prev by Date: rfc2307bis and samba woes
Next by Date: Re: rfc2307bis and samba woes
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread