[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: invalid syntax on pwdPolicy object add
Julien Vehent <julien@linuxwall.info> writes:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:51:01 +0200, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 9/14/10 8:40 AM, mailing lists wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I think that the pwdAttribute needs an OID value (specified by the syntax)
>>> so you would must use the OID of the userPassword attribute which is
>>> 2.5.4.35
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I thought that would be a possibility for the failure Kiran and Julien are facing, (please guys, can you give it a try ?), but IMO, there is no reason why we would not be allowed to use 'userPassword' in this context.
>> Using the OID instead of the alias name does not carry any extra
>> information, as soon as the alias is valid accordingly to the schema
>> (whatever it represents, be it an AT, OC, MR, or any of the other
>> kind of schema objects). The syntax should just check that the alias
>> is syntaxically correct. It's up to the ppolicy overlay to check
>> that the value is a valid AT.
>> Plus the error message is really misleading if this is the cause for
>> the error.
>
>
> I tried with the OID... same thing.
> How can I check that the module is properly loaded and functional ?
ldapsearch -x -H ldap://some.host -b "" -s base supportedControl\
| grep '1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.8.5.1'
-Dieter
--
Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung
sip: 7770535@sipgate.de
http://www.dpunkt.de/buecher/2104.html
GPG Key ID:8EF7B6C6