[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: RPM spec file

To: Joe Friedeggs <friedeggs44@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RPM spec file
From: Marco Pizzoli <marco.pizzoli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:34:36 +0200
Cc: bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=qdsSutDAIyYfs6dd3wcosQqFpaYOkeE+2FaNRbRXb+c=; b=RgbiAePc3EXiPajK0ZkjYjXrYuEhFOgWFmHEPvPD6+aSjbfgSkgdxw2/6vgQ62fLk1 7I1jSAm57qbs8gSd9RL58UG5Ofi646jNwNsOd0Tgf1RPOZjiBEbANmBN65gaglTAGmfz g8FS5JVl/rDI2tZsu7P68Zcoho7EpSvePAghA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=kbSIX4JRZXw7/GpVSgCWrp65eMFGSYqX04xZu8s++VxOsCm+uuyPQ4y7X0qBFasFXS ogAES9leq5bJs7rwtx0jezAMLgrK7Ganuh9Gdhq6PIJgIeBEpkvQyOZysAyUaaSYEBOv MqWOvSvGVIxp0KDdOCvChTXSVOn0NK22ub+AI=
In-reply-to: <BLU143-W10EF83224CD56B13EFDBDAA5090@phx.gbl>
References: <BLU143-W1575587CF78284E64713CFA50F0@phx.gbl> <201004191335.25359.bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net> <BLU143-W10EF83224CD56B13EFDBDAA5090@phx.gbl>

Hi,
I'm quite sure that Buchan chose to not incur in conflicts with openldap package provided by RH.
If the package was called the same as the RH one, you could be in trouble in trying to install/upgrade your system.

Me too I'm using Buchan's package and initially found this approach counter-intuitive, but it was only at the beginning... :-)

Regards
Marco

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Joe Friedeggs <friedeggs44@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> On Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:38:05 Joe Friedeggs wrote:
>>> I need to build a Red Hat rpm for the latest OpenLDAP release. I am
>>> looking for spec file, howto page, or anything else that might speed up
>>> this project. Any advice/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> There is also:
>>
>> http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/rhel5/openldap/
>>
>

> Thanks Buchan. I see RPMs of the later OpenLDAP versions are
> labeled 'openldap2'. Is this just a naming convention change, a
> work-around done for Red Hat, due to configuration file changes (similar
> to freeradius' explanation for freeradius2 at
> http://wiki.freeradius.org/Red_Hat_FAQ#Current_Pre-built_RPM.27s_for_RHEL_5_and_CentOS_5)?
> If not, what does the '2' designate?
>

Oops. I see now that is not 'openldap2' but 'openldap2.4'. I see you are now just adding the version in the name? Why the change? Why openldap2.4-2.4.20-1.el5.i386 instead of just openldap-2.4.20-1.el5.i386 (seems redundant)?

Thanks,

Joe

>
>
>> Regards,
>> Buchan
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.

> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3

_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1

--
_________________________________________
Non è forte chi non cade, ma chi cadendo ha la forza di rialzarsi.
Jim Morrison

References:
- RPM spec file
  - From: Joe Friedeggs <friedeggs44@hotmail.com>
- Re: RPM spec file
  - From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>
- RE: RPM spec file
  - From: Joe Friedeggs <friedeggs44@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Using Replication Slave For Authentication
Next by Date: RE: Re: OpenLDAP and SSH authentification
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread