[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
DO NOT HI-JACK OIDs [Was: Adding Objectclass account gives object class violation]
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 14:17 +0530, Shamika Joshi wrote:
> I tried adding my own auxiliary objectclass as below but I get this
> error, I'm definately not doing it right. apologies for the lack of
> schema knowledge, could you please correct me?
> sudo ldapmodify -x -D cn=admin,cn=config -W -f hostobject.ldif
> Enter LDAP Password:
> modifying entry "olcDatabase={0}config,cn=config"
> ldap_modify: Object class violation (65)
> additional info: attribute 'olcObjectClasses' not allowed
> hostobject.ldif:
> dn: olcDatabase={0}config,cn=config
> changetype: modify
> add: olcObjectClasses
> olcObjectClasses: ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6921.1.24 NAME 'hostobj'DESC 'Combine
> Samba and account' SUP top MUST $ account AUXILIARY )
Are you employed by Morrison Industries? If "No" then you cannot define
anything in "1.3.6.1.4.1.6921"
<http://www.alvestrand.no/objectid/1.3.6.1.4.1.6921.html>. You don't
just 'make up' OIDs. Either use an existing schema object or apply for
a [free] OID for your own use.
<http://pen.iana.org/pen/PenApplication.page>
> We use:
>
> objectclass ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6921.1.12
> NAME 'mHybridPerson'
> DESC 'Combine several objectclasses to support multiple MUAs'
> SUP ( inetOrgPerson $ officePerson $ evolutionPerson )
> STRUCTURAL )
>
> objectclass ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6921.1.24
> NAME 'mHybridUserAccount'
> DESC 'Combine mHybridPerson and account'
> SUP ( mHybridPerson $ account )
> STRUCTURAL )
>
> Or you can find, or define, an abstract objectclass that
> permits/requires the host attribute. [Although isn't it more
> elegant to
> use groups anyway?]
>
>
>