[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: replication

To: Frank Bonnet <f.bonnet@esiee.fr>
Subject: Re: replication
From: Benjamin Griese <der.darude@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:24:47 +0100
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=X3H0CtGzoggIR/bmvL0v1tCHs2raUwKyIrHp7BRBunc=; b=tHXShksLSg9wFehD3xp00QEjHpxO8gXfdQsd+nSNYXpCrrllIN5qxgNfwlXt/h1SQa IizCC+AXGrALyLezUsfDphjyLd73IlrVJTNaiHftjuLpVx5K1y/PZS5027VPnoPyIUmE zp5K3t0V1+XQRHzTWa8el9KueHt9q4HZW0MBk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=rLTEzx+m5C90HMXi1TZxcHv7J3qofCnwX2g13F1SZ3Ck8Z/c3TQTzAaJBPXZbh3j7o glCze4sSiowttCQGwreQAcPnRMZ3o+DpbRerRTEphL2Ust4duqrFxt8+OOuxGpLk3lCd d6o6B9mdhY5R0NN8BHWCSuvhAv1AobIxAlIK4=
In-reply-to: <4BA21C06.9020600@esiee.fr>
References: <4BA21C06.9020600@esiee.fr>

Hi Frank,

for backup reasons, did you think about a read only slave who has all the data of the maybe failed master?
When you repaired/replaced the master and have it back online, you would be able to restore them back to the master.

bye

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 13:26, Frank Bonnet <f.bonnet@esiee.fr> wrote:

Hello

I wanted to start a "replicant/backup" server at our site.

Actually we only have one openldap server that serve our LAN
and I want to start a slave server in case of master's crash.

I've read documentaion here
http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin24/replication.html

But I need some help to choose the best config for our site
( a backup server , that's all )

Thank you

--
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra

Follow-Ups:
- Re: replication
  - From: Frank Bonnet <f.bonnet@esiee.fr>

References:
- replication
  - From: Frank Bonnet <f.bonnet@esiee.fr>

Prev by Date: replication
Next by Date: Re: replication
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread