[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ACLs based on attributes?

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Subject: Re: ACLs based on attributes?
From: Jaap Winius <jwinius@umrk.nl>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:22:54 +0100
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <CA7C716EA83297CEDF0C378E@[192.168.1.2]>
References: <20100131010132.mt6mxu5o88xco440@www.umrk.nl> <87ljfelldy.fsf@rubin.avci.de> <20100131191207.vscokx4vl81wkgkg@www.umrk.nl> <0C0E6F46B05952CDC1ADD5F6@[192.168.1.2]> <CA7C716EA83297CEDF0C378E@[192.168.1.2]>
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.5)

Quoting Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>:

Blah, I was thinking this in the wrong direction.  Sets are likely what
you need.  I think the syntax would be more

by set.exact="user/title=telephonemanager" write

This looks great, but I've tested it (with slapd v2.4.11) andunfortunately it doesn't want to work. Could there any specialrequirements that might be necessary before sets can be used?


Thanks!

Jaap

References:
- ACLs based on attributes?
  - From: Jaap Winius <jwinius@umrk.nl>
- Re: ACLs based on attributes?
  - From: "Dieter Kluenter" <dieter@dkluenter.de>
- Re: ACLs based on attributes?
  - From: Jaap Winius <jwinius@umrk.nl>
- Re: ACLs based on attributes?
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: ACLs based on attributes?
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ACLs based on attributes?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread