[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: performance on Solaris

Subject: Re: performance on Solaris
From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:13:16 +0100
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hLmsbOjzdSn5/yofKDPTc54YfScGwyDh3c4X8VX27Mw=; b=Bya4rkrabTRHUeewR0Qxhqdp2uHHq5FEuSEopEdB7bzDj5aOdbaLsk8zr4vKfIzQme vcCq/zMNK8564avyjQF+ypVY97ANPhTdz3WSlsixaeUN4RgjCzgmpcPD8G3JBuq9jqyt 5tsxc9iceD5vUMdAcGK8IsnDMp9S02WMbBnlY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DWVsUIgOZk6LIqzD3zL44TH0xZGuwMJKs8V+IOtt9HfDp3Q4uPEM4dBtTQ1WvH0bBL /8FDlBmaX4+NtZ74gGTwwqpaBtKP8onb3rdqhc1y6dBmt11FyrM5hFUmR1xHe2Df7kLa 8HW1IrlbPiIJztbtTnq3tCHpCaQB3pYQnaYOE=
In-reply-to: <fb53dd1e1001280417w8226abenfeb10e45d8443795@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fb53dd1e1001271006w214ff91j498c48febf55ed9@mail.gmail.com> <0DF7FEBAFDAF6C6E64DBB32A@192.168.1.2> <fb53dd1e1001280417w8226abenfeb10e45d8443795@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)

Stefano Zanmarchi a écrit :

Thank you very much Quanah, you sound very encouraging.

Does anyone knows how OpenLDAP performs on Sun Solaris (10) on Sun's
hardware (sparc cpus)?

Some more data to complete the picture.
- OpenLDAP 2.4.16 + Berkeley BDB 4.7 + back-bdb
- 800.000 entries occupy 880MB (log excluded), and a typical entry would
just be:
     dn: uid=657321@myunit.myorg.org,
ou=people,dc=myorg,dc=org
     objectClass: account
     objectClass: simpleSecurityObject
     uid: 657321@myunit.myorg.org
     userPassword: whatever
- The "working set" is around 25% (i.e. most of the bind/updates will be
done on the same 200.000 entries)

Given these numbers, I thought 500MB be enough, do you agree?

Considering the price of 2 Gb, do you really think that it's a showstopper ?



--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: performance on Solaris
  - From: Stefano Zanmarchi <zanmarchi@gmail.com>

References:
- performance on Solaris
  - From: Stefano Zanmarchi <zanmarchi@gmail.com>
- Re: performance on Solaris
  - From: Stefano Zanmarchi <zanmarchi@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: performance on Solaris
Next by Date: Re: performance on Solaris
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread