Re: Valid configure options for 2.4.20

To: "J. Landamore" <jal@mcs.le.ac.uk>

Subject: Re: Valid configure options for 2.4.20

From: Matt Kassawara <battery@writeme.com>

Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:22:25 -0700

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=QcS971ivgSr2tROrOp4H6O84zrKq1+MhFPi83W6ALr8=; b=fuU9xTQChMPdEPmYUiwCUyoCxOFTAlkFL24mK5NTaXY+GOI7J4+SG1zqy3vCkukNAW 7PTToDs78aK+TOsR9QMMQzABDeHY96Flh1ocwUoL3k/jqJl5jd+Cd58I6KERxgdn+K9l tmg9FSgvk+v5n0y0mUbMqALGVwW7LMLfyqqaU=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=Ch2T4/XI9/zMtLPP+P2VpQWalAHEnLcO93rAlK7Oc5uNGoyTor2r0cCZWDfkD1MFNc 3U/EaGfRiWe+e3oY8dRbLykdH0KMFDXiuhpl+1r+o5BsPohPpc/EDxtKTx4lGEcM+Z/E rxL2J4f6OdZWtV1cvYakJCtnlcg/73N6p2Z2I=

In-reply-to: <20091214145717.GG10248@mcs.le.ac.uk>

References: <20091214145717.GG10248@mcs.le.ac.uk>

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:57 AM, J. Landamore <jal@mcs.le.ac.uk> wrote:

I'm trying to build 2.4.20 so that it stores the userPassword attribute
crypt'ed rather than in clear text - yes I know it violates the RFC.

I tried

./configure --enable-crypt --disable-cleartext

This compiled fine but failed test002-populate for bdb

Is this a valid configuration and will it achieve what I want?

Is it possible to store the userPassword attribute crypt'ed?

Thanks

John

--
John Landamore

Department of Computer Science
University of Leicester
University Road, LEICESTER, LE1 7RH
J.Landamore@mcs.le.ac.uk
Phone: +44 (0)116 2523410 Fax: +44 (0)116 2523604

References:

Valid configure options for 2.4.20
- From: "J. Landamore" <jal@mcs.le.ac.uk>