Re: Two contextCSNs

[Peter Mogensen <apm@mutex.dk>]

Howard Chu wrote:
> Sounds like a change was written on server2 and received on server1. The 
> above message just means that server1 is not going to try to send the 
> same change back to server2. (I.e., perfectly normal.) So the question 
> is, why are you saying that no writes have occurred on server2, when the 
> logs and contextCSNs show otherwise?

Good question.
Because I really don't do any changes on server2. But I can't say if 
syncrepl do.

Basicly, I load the data on server1 AND server2, start server1, make 
changes to server1 and THEN start server2.
Besides the one slapadd I do to load the LDIF from server1 the only 
operations I do on server2 is ldapsearch and slapcat.

/Peter