[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
solaris patch vs. linux patch
- To: openldap-technical <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
- Subject: solaris patch vs. linux patch
- From: "Brett @Google" <brett.maxfield@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:53:30 +1000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=g0R6X7jO38ZgsoQwj30jCxlmwTQA9KfFC8omNJNOD6Y=; b=Uv89oCdApdZU/P5unle/acgMZcDcPR4TJ+HD+iyobFPH3o8hV7lDCJH4TL/UJXtx/i 5HVu9VqTjfJGgqVALIld6+TdQx6uw0rdIbxLslDgJ0pbQzrgrbdJiHczJ1R/B3U961t2 s8dxkEP4zzCQQUvIJoBJxtz4L7eMoqNVFbq3g=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=HJHi9FDXLBmXNULjekObUm5fI2UN0ppLxopx3/hjn7bZmxQBEBTYKp86kIxgGs3v1W /JkGTLAmFZUhc8OjEYUbGbI6ObDiLiXUfrOVJpVxm+bdFaXEtp1yN4lRK8xB4qi2yUQN hDxXEzmnnq/6T7tPOP3kzYAJfqye0NkObSW1k=
Hello,
Just wondering if anybody knows why solaris patch refuses to process the bdb 4.7 patch files, where the patch command on linux works perfectly.
Ie: on solaris :
patch -p0 <patch.4.7.25.1
Looks like a context diff to me...
Hunk #1 failed at line 187.
Hunk #3 failed at line 296.
2 out of 4 hunks failed: saving rejects to sequence/sequence.c.rej
done
Works fine on a linux machine ?
Have tried patch 2.5.9 built from soruce on gnu.org, this fails also.
(i usually end up patching on linux, and then copying the patched tarball back to solaris.. but just wondering?)
Cheers
Brett