Re: ldapi -> "Confidentiality required" problem

[Gunnar Frenzel <Gunnar_Frenzel@web.de>]

Dieter Kluenter schrieb:
> "Dieter Kluenter" <dieter@dkluenter.de> writes:
[...]
> > [...]
> > > security ssf=128
> > [...]
> > The hard coded ssf for ldapi is 71, so you have to reduce security
> > ssf.

When I change security ssf=128 to a lower value then this affects not 
only ldapi but ldaps as well, right? I want to leave ldaps to require 
TLS but reduce security for ldapi only, so I could not achieve this by 
reducing security ssf?


> the default ssf for ldapi can be modified by adding localSSF <ssf> to
> slapd.conf(5). 

As I wrote I tried adding:
localSSF	0
to slapd.conf but this didn't not change the behaviour at all. :(


Gunnar