[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Cosine schema - RFC 4524

To: Zdenek Styblik <stybla@turnovfree.net>
Subject: Re: Cosine schema - RFC 4524
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 14:04:02 +0200
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <4A1E5223.4070104@turnovfree.net>
References: <4A1E5223.4070104@turnovfree.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090402 SeaMonkey/1.1.16

Zdenek Styblik wrote:
> 
> my question is regarding updated Cosine schema [RFC 4524] which has been
> accepted in March 1991 by IANA. This obsoletes previous Cosine schema
> [RFC 1274].
> OpenLDAP has support for RFC 4524, yet it comes with pre-defined older
> RFC 1274.
> So, I'm wondering, is there reason for keep using RFC 1274, or is it
> safe to define/create new Cosine schema by RFC 4524?
> Note: I've found ldif file which corresponds with RFC 4524, but no
> schema file. But I think [believe] it won't be that hard to define
> schema by published RFC. But, if somebody knows where I can get those
> files for OpenLDAP, I would be really happy.

Could you please elaborate on which specific problems you see with
cosine.schema shipped with OpenLDAP (despite the outdated comment and
DESC texts)?

Ciao, Michael.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cosine schema - RFC 4524
  - From: Zdenek Styblik <stybla@turnovfree.net>

References:
- Cosine schema - RFC 4524
  - From: Zdenek Styblik <stybla@turnovfree.net>

Prev by Date: schema compliance checking tool (was: Recommendations for adding "MUST" attribute to in-production objectclass?)
Next by Date: Re: Cosine schema - RFC 4524
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread