[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)

To: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Subject: Re: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
From: Duncan Gibb <Duncan.Gibb@SiriusIT.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:07:49 +0100
Cc: "openldap-technical@openldap.org" <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
In-reply-to: <4A0D4919.5060803@stroeder.com>
Organization: Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom :: Rivermead House, Hamm Moor Lane, Weybridge, Surrey KT15 2SF :: Registered in England and Wales, company number 03633198 :: VAT number GB 824 0715 51
References: <E9EE373D35AB4C4A99CCF042C12B6E9A0422E6F0D8@ex-ind-u1.vanenburg.com> <200905071122.51456.bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net> <E9EE373D35AB4C4A99CCF042C12B6E9A0422E6F69F@ex-ind-u1.vanenburg.com> <200905071552.55245.bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net> <E9EE373D35AB4C4A99CCF042C12B6E9A0422FEE68E@ex-ind-u1.vanenburg.com> <4A0D2918.5050903@SiriusIT.co.uk> <4A0D2FBD.8040501@stroeder.com> <4A0D3213.7060709@SiriusIT.co.uk> <4A0D4919.5060803@stroeder.com>
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103)

Michael Ströder wrote:

MS> IIRC the original poster wanted to use multi-master
MS> replication (MMR). So given the various MMR-related
MS> fixes *after* 2.4.11 it's wrong to point him to a
MS> 2.4.11 build because he might raise issues here which
MS> are already solved.

OK.  I didn't read the whole thread.  I saw someone wanting to install
2.4.11 on RHEL/CentOS, which we have reasonably well-tested packages for.

I entirely agree that new deployments should use not earlier than the
latest stable release, and MMR especially so.

We don't currently have 2.4.16 for RHEL, but someone will.


Cheers


Duncan

-- 
Duncan Gibb - Technical Director
Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
http://www.siriusit.co.uk/ || t: +44 870 608 0063
Debian Cyrus Team - https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-cyrus-imapd/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability
  - From: Kukkala Prasad <kprasad@cordys.com>
- Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability
  - From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>
- RE: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability
  - From: Kukkala Prasad <kprasad@cordys.com>
- Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability
  - From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>
- RE: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability
  - From: Kukkala Prasad <kprasad@cordys.com>
- 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
  - From: Duncan Gibb <Duncan.Gibb@SiriusIT.co.uk>
- Re: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
  - From: Duncan Gibb <Duncan.Gibb@SiriusIT.co.uk>
- Re: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
Next by Date: Re: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread