[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Segfault during Auth Benchmark request

To: Luca Scamoni <luca.scamoni@sys-net.it>
Subject: Re: Segfault during Auth Benchmark request
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:24:33 -0700
Cc: "SAGNIMORTE Thomas \(CAMPUS\)" <thomas.sagnimorte@oxylane-group.com>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <49EF52AB.6090301@sys-net.it>
References: <200904220853.n3M8r88s010040@boole.openldap.org> <F4FF85F85050A829067066DE@[192.168.1.199]> <49EF52AB.6090301@sys-net.it>

--On Wednesday, April 22, 2009 7:23 PM +0200 Luca Scamoni<luca.scamoni@sys-net.it> wrote:

Quanah Gibson-Mount ha scritto:

--On Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:52 AM +0200 "SAGNIMORTE Thomas

I set entry cache to 100000, idlcache to 10000 and dncache to 10000.


Seems reasonable.


Since cachesize is 100K entries shouldn't idlcachesize be 300K ? (he's
using hdb backend)

Hm, I read that all as 10k. I'm guessing that a 100k cachesize and a 10kidlcachesize wouldn't be greatly productive, but I've often run my HDBbackends with the same cachesize/idlcachesize without ill effect.


--Quanah



--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Segfault during Auth Benchmark request
  - From: "SAGNIMORTE Thomas (CAMPUS)" <thomas.sagnimorte@oxylane-group.com>

References:
- RE: Segfault during Auth Benchmark request
  - From: "SAGNIMORTE Thomas (CAMPUS)" <thomas.sagnimorte@oxylane-group.com>
- RE: Segfault during Auth Benchmark request
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: Segfault during Auth Benchmark request
  - From: Luca Scamoni <luca.scamoni@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: Re: Segfault during Auth Benchmark request
Next by Date: Re: Adding OU with PSQL backend
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread