Le jeudi 16 avril 2009 19:05:58, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit : > --On Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:18 PM +0200 Adrien Futschik > > <adrien.futschik@atosorigin.com> wrote: > > Le jeudi 16 avril 2009 14:04:44, Michael Ströder a écrit : > >> Adrien Futschik wrote: > >> > I am aware I should migrate, but for the moment, the only solution I > >> > have would be to migrate to OpenLDAP 2.3.32, > >> > >> Why? Please don't take this personally. But if that is because you > >> strictly rely on Linux distribution packages I'd like to note that your > >> operational concept is already flawed. > > > > Because the client I am working for uses source-compiled versions of > > OpenLDAP and is curently running 2.3.11 or 2.3.32. There is no newer > > package for the moment. We are working on a OpenLDAP 2.4.16 or newer, > > but, production is critical and we can not wait for this one to be > > released (by our team). > > > > > > I know very well that many changes have been made between 2.3.11 and the > > latest 2.3.x and even between 2.3.32 and the latest 2.3.x, but we can not > > afford to migrate to 2.4.x right now. > > At a minimum, you should be using 2.3.43 on all your servers. You should > be responsible for making sure your client uses the most up to date and > stable release available for them to use, if you are given them support. > Otherwise, you are failing in that support relationship. |