[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Reentrant library question.

To: Michael StrÃder <michael@stroeder.com>
Subject: Re: Reentrant library question.
From: Duncan Gibb <Duncan.Gibb@SiriusIT.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:23:12 +0100
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <48C927E9.2020604@stroeder.com>
Organization: Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts
References: <20080911090634.AKO38504@mpoint.hvcc.edu> <48C92342.50308@SiriusIT.co.uk> <48C927E9.2020604@stroeder.com>
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)

Michael StrÃder wrote:

MS> Hmm, a backport 2.4.11 -> 2.4.7 does not sound good to me.

I meant "backport" in the Debian sense of building a newer version of a
specific package (in this case OpenLDAP) for an older release of the
distribution (Etch).

MS> Why don't you just take the upstream 2.4.11 code of OpenLDAP
MS> for building the Debian packages? Or will you?

We did.  Debian is shipping 2.4.10 in Lenny, but only 2.3.30 in Etch.
We want to run 2.4.11 on Etch, at least for the time being.


Cheers


Duncan

-- 
Duncan Gibb, Technical Architect
Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts
http://www.siriusit.co.uk/
Tel: +44 870 608 0063 || +44 7977 441 515

References:
- Reentrant library question.
  - From: William Jojo <w.jojo@hvcc.edu>
- Re: Reentrant library question.
  - From: Duncan Gibb <Duncan.Gibb@SiriusIT.co.uk>
- Re: Reentrant library question.
  - From: Michael StrÃder <michael@stroeder.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Reentrant library question.
Next by Date: Re: Help: Slow LDAP search with high %iowait
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread