Re: translucent overlay with local-only entries

[Sven Ulland <sveniu@ifi.uio.no>]

Gavin Henry wrote:
[...]
> > Are they really correct? With local-only entries working well (as
> > they should, with my recent version of openldap), I would assume
> > that local-only would return local-only entries, and that
> > local-and-remote would return both remote and local entries.
>
> So are you getting local entries at all?

I see local *modifications*, yes. Example: A remote entry with
uid=andrew is edited on the translucent extension with a new
description. When searching, I see the locally changed description
without problems.

On the other hand, when I create *entries* that only exist on the
translucent extension, I never see any sign of them when searching. I
do see them when running slapcat, so they are indeed present in the
local database.

This should be fixed with Howard's 2.4.8 patch some time ago, so I can
only assume there's something strange with my config or the 2.4.10
Debian build. I will try to build a vanilla OpenLDAP from source as
soon as I have time.

sven