Re: slapd memory footprint

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>]

--On Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:21 AM +0200 Stelios Grigoriadis 
<stelios.xx.grigoriadis@ericsson.com> wrote:

> After running some test we observed that slapd is consuming a
> considerable amount of memory, why is that? We ran one client that
> retrieved the entire tree (it was pretty small anyway) and 10 other
> clients that searched for a particular item. Comparing version 2.3.39
> with 2.3.32 the footprint increases. From top:
>
> Is this to be expected? By decreasing the cachesize we got:

The following things affect the size of slapd:

BDB cache size in DB_CONFIG
Number of file descriptors made available to slapd
Entry cache (cachesize in slapd.conf)
idlcachesize (in slapd.conf)


--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration