On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 22:37 -0800, Howard Chu wrote: > Howard Chu wrote: > > You have "index name eq" which is a supertype of cn. That means cn is going to > > be indexed anyway. It could be that we have a bug here, not checking the > > supertype's index. I'll look into that. > > There was a bug in HEAD due to the broken component matching support code. > This bug doesn't occur in 2.4 or 2.3 since that code is already disabled in > the releases. I've #if'd it out of HEAD as well. But in the meantime, you > should rethink what you're indexing. Ahh, yes. I no longer use 'name' (instead adding a new attribute samba4RDN to hold the relative distinguished name), so I shall move the index to that attribute. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part