[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
how to NOT use SASL
- To: openldap-software@openldap.org
- Subject: how to NOT use SASL
- From: Frank Van Damme <frank.vandamme@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:48:49 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ti7hpSiG8i+d7YZYIs74sYTk9bwcr/Hxau+lLf2SuiU=; b=nZy8TMnFKpUYNv86DZpiF+FVvN4ypmqzjlHWfHxQGc8V+pwEm/r15DtMB90ZFG47mO UXu5cNvDkmLZeVDNQfeiwlPPQo5Y/wWCSJljCDx2OZsEU1L182oiOVvLp3SHlRyOxWYf e3d5DchjSkAkJenB8uMJzhPqt5AspEpJ+Hsms=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=htdSWuRDiaepG06A8SA5a1PhMzQKMR92kuQk41ZgVEZE7muOddWlpUpZE20IPEC9/1 PCTvmyKGHsQS+go8GUd79kcrT4pj6hppFbLmi7SxS3mXZGOifLCWNsR7Ofm1tWdIZKsh SbHdsps44ECqf/4Rv3DR8hxNIcYBNBo0HPKMQ=
Hi list,
Now this is something I don't understand. TSL shouldn't require the
use of sasl, logically speaking, yet why am I getting this output?
frvdamme@osc1:~$ ldapsearch -w dd -D
'cn=admin,dc=otec,dc=vub,dc=ac,dc=be' '(cn=admin)' -H
ldap://localhost -x
ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49)
frvdamme@osc1:~$ ldapsearch -w dd -D
'cn=admin,dc=otec,dc=vub,dc=ac,dc=be' '(cn=admin)' -x -H ldap://osc1
-x
ldap_sasl_bind(SIMPLE): Can't contact LDAP server (-1)
So the only difference is how I specify the hostname and ldapsearch
chooses to use sasl, even though I'm specifying -x. Why??
--
Frank Van Damme
A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation.
Q: Why is it bad?
A: No, it's bad.
Q: Should I top post in replies to mailing lists or on Usenet?