[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: syncrepl's "retry" option

To: masarati@aero.polimi.it, Ryan Steele <ryans@aweber.com>
Subject: Re: syncrepl's "retry" option
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:15:57 -0700
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <c840a7d124089aabdfa2c3cf66f2691d.squirrel@www.aero.polimi.it>
References: <038FFCC0F44977205483D982@[192.168.1.2]> <4BCF01FB.20300@aweber.com> <c840a7d124089aabdfa2c3cf66f2691d.squirrel@www.aero.polimi.it>

--On Wednesday, April 21, 2010 5:59 PM +0200 masarati@aero.polimi.it wrote:

The docs only present the "," because that's the preferred way.  The other
forms are supported mainly for historical reasons.  You should stick with
the documentation.  The tests should use the documented form.


"," is historical...  The FAQ entry is all that needs fixing.

--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

Follow-Ups:
- Re: syncrepl's "retry" option
  - From: masarati@aero.polimi.it
- Re: syncrepl's "retry" option
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- Re: syncrepl's "retry" option
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: syncrepl's "retry" option
  - From: Ryan Steele <ryans@aweber.com>
- Re: syncrepl's "retry" option
  - From: masarati@aero.polimi.it

Prev by Date: Re: syncrepl's "retry" option
Next by Date: Re: syncrepl's "retry" option
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread