[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: syncrepl_del_nonpresent and syncrepl issues.

To: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
Subject: Re: syncrepl_del_nonpresent and syncrepl issues.
From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:18:41 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <4BC50295.1060601@lundman.net>
References: <4BBEA50C.9030007@lundman.net> <4BC50295.1060601@lundman.net>
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (SOC 1167 2008-08-23)

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Jorgen Lundman wrote:

Perhaps it is time to go to a newer version of OpenLDAP. The 2.3.41 versionwas recommended to us about 3 years ago on this list. What is therecommended/most-stable version at the moment? Should we also upgradeBerkeleyDB?

The official recommendation is athttp://www.openldap.org/software/download/

Unofficially, I'm very happy with 2.4.21, BDB 4.8.26, at the moment. We'vebeen on those revs for a bit over a month now. Both the behavior and thestability have been excellent.

References:
- syncrepl_del_nonpresent and syncrepl issues.
  - From: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
- Re: syncrepl_del_nonpresent and syncrepl issues.
  - From: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>

Prev by Date: Re: syncrepl_del_nonpresent and syncrepl issues.
Next by Date: Re: bindDN-rewriting - can't get to grips with overlays rwm+relay
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread