[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: slow slave performance

To: Thierry Lacoste <lacoste@u-pec.fr>
Subject: Re: slow slave performance
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:58:14 -0700
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <B9C8B314-0203-449D-BF13-A27DB324F271@u-pec.fr>
References: <20100329093042.18734l1x2ktyrauc@www.standard.k12.ca.us> <3B14FF7EF8BABB8F2DE8AE16@[192.168.1.2]> <20100329114126.439710a3fr4w0dis@www.standard.k12.ca.us> <C8B1EDA88677625DA7674AEB@[192.168.1.2]> <B9C8B314-0203-449D-BF13-A27DB324F271@u-pec.fr>

--On Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:31 PM +0200 Thierry Lacoste<lacoste@u-pec.fr> wrote:



For running a production LDAP service, I near always recommend
building and maintaining it yourself.

I'm interested in the exceptions you have in mind with "near always".


Symas provides packages, and so does Buchan Milne.

What do you think about building via ports on *BSD systems (pkgsrc on
NetBSD) ?
AFAICT it generally produces a resonably up-to-date release (provided you
have
an up-to-date port tree of course).


No idea, I've never used the BSD port systems.

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

References:
- slow slave performance
  - From: Jefferson Davis <jdavis@standard.k12.ca.us>
- Re: slow slave performance
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: slow slave performance
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: slow slave performance
  - From: Thierry Lacoste <lacoste@u-pec.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: slow slave performance
Next by Date: Re: Slave connecting to maser always stay connected?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread