[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: poor performance of db-4.8.26?

To: Dieter Kluenter <dieter@dkluenter.de>
Subject: Re: poor performance of db-4.8.26?
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:58:24 -0800
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <87d3zgcgr4.fsf@rubin.avci.de>
References: <87bpf02woy.fsf@rubin.avci.de> <87d3zgcgr4.fsf@rubin.avci.de>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; rv:1.9.3a2pre) Gecko/20100212 Firefox 3.6

Dieter Kluenter wrote:

"Dieter Kluenter"<dieter@dkluenter.de>  writes:

Hi,
I'm just testing performance of db-4.5.20 vs. db-4.8.26 and found that
db-4.8.26 much slower than db-4.5.20.

Is there any advantage in building with db-4.8.26?

On Solaris we've run into deadlocks with db-4.7.25 that were fixed byswitching to db-4.8. Haven't seen the same situation on Linux.


--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: poor performance of db-4.8.26?
  - From: "Dieter Kluenter" <dieter@dkluenter.de>

References:
- poor performance of db-4.8.26?
  - From: "Dieter Kluenter" <dieter@dkluenter.de>
- Re: poor performance of db-4.8.26?
  - From: "Dieter Kluenter" <dieter@dkluenter.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Question about /etc/openldap/ldap.conf
Next by Date: Re: Using back-ldap as a client-side proxy/cache
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread