[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
syncrepl partial copy
- To: openldap <openldap-software@openldap.org>
- Subject: syncrepl partial copy
- From: FRLinux <frlinux@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:03:09 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=5uN+8KjSZ8gnmhwhYbjPrs6MHCypgIMQKczqEMmL7po=; b=cp6K3X9kZfgwnaB9yys4xda3BqfrxCx4NcxIk4FHcPQ5uo+PamiLlNidiKTyw6CvtE JndvwVj80fuN/UYiyLGdbFiJ9t16oBF6gsOGFNozOpoVlo5i8Z8wtZXwMnHek1LiHBdj ME6sHi7PViQ9Q6vYoPyIs7spoczZfb7d0VCFY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=QKTUC64BsV4dywTRX+glG834eIf6CNxmxW5tLVbbe2zACe/q+RglbrccpuuXKdUQIs UCfa6ONxLoZBeDvtvlFba5RRAyXta5Szth2w2kW72M9AW7B1GfHVin2fgpsT1KE+jhvp ZV/4snHMBA+Outd5unitliKrql+nX+XV5atqE=
Hello,
I am now facing a new issue which could well be due to me but I need
to be sure. I have set a new slave running 2.4.17 on Debian whilst the
master is a 2.3.43 running on FreeBSD 6.4. I have observed a similar
behavior on a slave running 2.3.43 also on FreeBSD.
That behavior is that when you start an empty database, syncrepl
starts copying the content but usually stops after a while (ie. copies
only part of the database but far from all objects).
Is it recommended to slapcat the objects when setting up a new slave
or is syncrepl able to do that by itself?
This is my syncrepl rules:
syncrepl rid=124 \
provider=ldaps://masterldap.example.com:636 \
type=refreshAndPersist \
searchbase="dc=example,dc=com" \
scope=sub \
filter="(objectClass=*)" \
attrs="*" \
schemachecking=off \
tls_cacert=/etc/ldap/cert/cacert.pem \
binddn="cn=ldaprep,dc=example,dc=com" \
credentials=xxxxxx
Cheers,
Steph