[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32

To: openldap-software@openldap.org
Subject: Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
From: Wes Rogers <skolpatrol@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:31:47 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=++xWBAdIPcnLBJA1nbOqZA7QjQvn75OF9xaxB+OHEDs=; b=RZ4XGUXeYK9OSRj7lvDQk7y0ms9kmZ/zcr64J9pENKzl7FBEeXj8wwsX1xApgJyhVt 830wqOF0JQWAC9ExSo9QVGuQwXJjvBPcZ1DPFFxz0W4NWt4efFY4P23/Cv2J089LuXEz fDBQURdJWWVl47iS+WcMWawRUHmV0qffybdzQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Xmv/XGbz2OCCRP3OuAAmvZD3is57c6gpPXDYt/mGEfx42DEEkTuF1YxYOL+p70yTpg XsNKJtaq1+0fqAyXbwJAFSLpuA8DtvFWq0hs0xCrjU5YbuMFUDCARLtYUXCsP0nvKvzS NfR9enxXCts20B3NJKyqrZiCfz/N1n3Ua8I2A=
In-reply-to: <728157.26494.qm@web33807.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0907211414160.12094-100000@eclipse.cl.msu.edu> <142668.88207.qm@web33802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <991EEC36D24B69D9A812C166@10.72.76.54> <C65F80C878CCF24A9BC19646DE2DCA6203490055@EXVG.fanniemae.com> <9A4447F141C18BF2DCE8A3A4@192.168.1.199> <20090722024800.GA15667@boost.horde.net> <alpine.BSO.2.00.0907212120540.12912@vanye.sendmail.com> <637146.4203.qm@web33807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20090729172044.GA28200@boost.horde.net> <728157.26494.qm@web33807.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:34 AM, David J.
Andruczyk<djandruczyk@yahoo.com> wrote:
> The network is essentially "flat",  the LDAP servers and systems requiring LDAP are on the same subnetwork, hence why when using the F5's for LDAP balancing all traffic will appears to come from the F5

Have you tried enabling source NAT on the VIP, so the connections then
are seen as coming from the clients, instead of the bigIP?

Wes

Follow-Ups:
- Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: "David J. Andruczyk" <djandruczyk@yahoo.com>

References:
- Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: "Sean O'Malley" <omalleys@msu.edu>
- Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: "David J. Andruczyk" <djandruczyk@yahoo.com>
- RE: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: "Clowser, Jeff" <jeff_clowser@fanniemae.com>
- Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: John Morrissey <jwm@horde.net>
- Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: Philip Guenther <guenther+ldapsoft@sendmail.com>
- Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: "David J. Andruczyk" <djandruczyk@yahoo.com>
- Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: John Morrissey <jwm@horde.net>
- Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: "David J. Andruczyk" <djandruczyk@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
Next by Date: Re: slapcat and machines
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread