[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Is OpenLDAP RFC 3687-compliant?

To: Hanz Akkerman <mudraia@list.ru>
Subject: Re: Is OpenLDAP RFC 3687-compliant?
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:19:47 -0700
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <4A5AE857.8070405@list.ru>
References: <mailman.3.1247313601.37028.openldap-software@openldap.org> <4A5AE857.8070405@list.ru>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; rv:1.9.1b5pre) Gecko/20090630 SeaMonkey/2.0a1pre Firefox/3.0.3

Hanz Akkerman wrote:

Hi4All!

Dear Kurt Zeilenga, dear developers of OpenLDAP!
Tell me please, does the RFC 3687 (Component Matching) supported  in the
current release or no? I know that OpenLDAP supported it in versions
2.3.x, but i am in doubt, why OpenLDAP-SNACC compilation failed with
OpenLDAP-2.4.16? I think that OpenLDAP-SNACC is freazed and unsuppiorted
now. Am i right?

Yes, the SNACC code has rotted pretty badly and no one has been maintaining itin quite some time.


Also see ITS#4112, #4289, #4699, #5429...

It seems to me that a replacement for SNACC needs to be found, but first wehave to find a developer who's interested enough to do any of that work.

--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

References:
- Is OpenLDAP RFC 3687-compliant?
  - From: Hanz Akkerman <mudraia@list.ru>

Prev by Date: Is OpenLDAP RFC 3687-compliant?
Next by Date: aliasedObject not found
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread