On 3/10/09 12:20 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:--On Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:49 AM -0400 Francis Swasey
To be specific, there are changes that make it into the master server, and the auditlog overlay logs them, but the accesslog overlay does NOT put them in the accesslog database, so they do not get sent to the replica servers.
It seems to be some kind of race condition. I haven't figured out a way to reproduce the failure yet.
Oh, you have auditlog in place too? I don't believe you mentioned that before. I bet it is related to them both being enabled.
It is the first time I've mentioned it in this thread, but I've mentioned it in previous threads.
So -- why would having auditlog and accesslog (and syncprov) all used with a database cause accesslog to miss some of the changes?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration