Re: dn cache size exceeds the limits

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>]

--On Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:50 PM +0200 Pavlos Parissis 
<p_pavlos@freemail.gr> wrote:

> > <http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=5721>
>
> Well, when I sent the mail this ITS wasn't there.
>
> But, how long is that "temporarily" ?
> In my case it was 32000 entries more than the limit.

As long as the conditions noted in ITS#5721 apply, I'd think.

> Isn't it too dangerous to have that "termporarily" period?

Dangerous how?  Previous releases had no upper limit, and although that 
caused more memory usage, it wasn't dangerous...

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration