[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Substitute for include

To: John Nietzsche <john.nietzsche@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Substitute for include
From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:05:32 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <58eb69ab0809040608k345392aai44bd9e1397e90f8e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <58eb69ab0809040608k345392aai44bd9e1397e90f8e@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, John Nietzsche wrote:

i am setting my ldap configuration. I read that includes are
deprecated. What is it supposed to be the replacement?

The concept of an include doesn't fit well with the concept of back-config's dynamic configuration. Therefore, there is no direct replacement. See http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200701/msg00280.html.

References:
- Substitute for include
  - From: "John Nietzsche" <john.nietzsche@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Documentation
Next by Date: Failure populating ldap.
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread