Re: [JunkMail] Re: syncrepl with more that one database

[Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>]

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Saturday, February 09, 2008 9:27 AM -0800 James Hartley
> <james.hartley@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> > ah very good.... The documentaion I read seems to imply the number was
> > tied to the replica,
> > ie if the slave one used rid 001 then slave2 would use rid002.
> >
> > According to your email
> >
> > I would need rid001 for database 1 and rid002 for database 2 in the
> > conf file for slave 1 and if I had another slave, say slave2 I would
> > need to have an rid003 and rid004.
> >
> > Thank you for clarifying this point.
>
> Keep replies on the list.  And no, you are incorrect still.  The RIDs need
> to be unique per database, on a given replica.

They need to be unique per *server*, not per database.

  So rid001 and rid002 on
> replica1, rid001 and rid002 on replica2, is just fine.
-
  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.org/project/