[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index

To: Andreas Hasenack <ahasenack@terra.com.br>
Subject: Re: Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index
From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:40:12 -0800 (PST)
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <1202215584.15128.0.camel@duo.lowtech>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.55.0802030710060.208@loogie.intranet.csupomona.edu> <47A73113.2050805@stroeder.com> <Pine.GSO.4.55.0802041207190.3132@loogie.intranet.csupomona.edu> <1202215584.15128.0.camel@duo.lowtech>

On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Andreas Hasenack wrote:

> > Yes. Nothing had changed on the server since the upgrade. There were
> > successful deletes before this one and some successful ones after.
>
> Was your OL 2.3.40 built with the same version of berkeley DB as the
> previous 2.3.35 one? (Sorry if you already answered that)

Yes.


-- 
Paul B. Henson  |  (909) 979-6361  |  http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst  |  henson@csupomona.edu
California State Polytechnic University  |  Pomona CA 91768

References:
- Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index
  - From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
- Re: Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index
  - From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
- Re: Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index
  - From: Andreas Hasenack <ahasenack@terra.com.br>

Prev by Date: Re: Upgrade to 2.3.40 -> failed index
Next by Date: Re: issues with proxycache overlay
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread