Re: write, then read delay with syncrepl/slapo-chain ?

[Peter Mogensen <apm@mutex.dk>]

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> Peter Mogensen wrote:
> > Ah... "don't use copy" is slapd 2.4. I forgot to say I'm on 2.3 - for now.
> > Anyway... I thought that was the whole point of slapo-chain - to get
> > automatic referral chasing.
>
> It is.  But if a client knows it's doing something weird (like write,
> then read, potentially to a consumer) then it needs to take precautions,
> like don't use copy.  In that case, the consumer would return a
> referral, and slapo-chain would chase it transparently.

ah... Fair enough. I see what you meant now. That would also be ok. A 
lot better for me than handling database connections to the master. 
Unfortunately that seems to imply a move to slapd 2.4.

Thanks for the input.

Peter