Re: 2.4.6 prov/con, delta-syncrepl and auditContext

["Gavin Henry" <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>]

> So, the only reason to have slapo-accesslog(5) built and loaded **BUT
> NOT INSTANTIATED** on the __consumer__ (doesn't sound such strikingly
> resource intensive a requirement) is to have this attribute defined in
> the schema.  If this sounds so unreasonable, please suggest (and code) a
> better strategy.  I'm open to everything (including zapping auditContext
> at all, unless anyone out there finds it useful and is actively using it).


Here's a question for you ;-)

How can test043-delta-syncrepl pass, when there is no accesslog module
loaded in slapd-deltasync-slave.conf?

Confused again...

Gavin.