[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Supported RFC's and "features"

To: OpenLDAP Software List <openldap-software@openldap.org>
Subject: Re: Supported RFC's and "features"
From: Dave Horsfall <daveh@coreng.com.au>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:53:20 +1100 (EST)
Archive: No
In-reply-to: <473CFC2E.4040002@symas.com>
References: <C65F80C878CCF24A9BC19646DE2DCA62C34D69@EXVG.fanniemae.com> <7743EC04412860CD732469B1@deus-ex.zimbra.com> <20071115235154.GB5827@xpeerience.u-strasbg.fr> <473CFC2E.4040002@symas.com>

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Howard Chu wrote:

> In OpenLDAP you would set an equality index on uidNumber and do a query 
> for, e.g., (uidNumber<=2147483647) with sizelimit=1.

Why would that return the highest?  Or are you counting upon the current 
LIFO behaviour and if so, is this now guaranteed?

-- 
Dave Horsfall DTM VK2KFU  Ph: +61 2 9552-5509 (direct) +61 2 9552-5500 (switch)
Corinthian Eng'ng P/L, Ste 54 Jones Bay Whf, 26-32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont 2009, AU

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Supported RFC's and "features"
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- Supported RFC's and "features"
  - From: "Clowser, Jeff (Contractor)" <jeff_clowser@fanniemae.com>
- Re: Supported RFC's and "features"
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: Supported RFC's and "features"
  - From: Marc Chantreux <marc.chantreux@ulpmm.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: Supported RFC's and "features"
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Supported RFC's and "features"
Next by Date: Re: Slurpd problems
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread