[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: strict ldif check

To: "Hallvard B Furuseth" <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Subject: Re: strict ldif check
From: "1" <proforg@tic-tac.ru>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 18:47:45 +0300
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
References: <001f01c822e1$e8e42170$7602630a@amarkov.datafort.ru> <hbf.20071109qz53@bombur.uio.no>

Doesn OpenLDAP really violates RFC here?
Not RFC 2251:-)


Thanks, Hallvard!
Now I got it ;)

But it's a pity to learn that OpenLDAP doesn't fully support actual RFC :(

Regards,
Alexander

Follow-Ups:
- Re: strict ldif check
  - From: Gavin Henry <ghenry@OpenLDAP.org>

References:
- strict ldif check
  - From: "1" <proforg@tic-tac.ru>
- Re: strict ldif check
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

Prev by Date: Re: openldap 2.4.6 - cn=config tree
Next by Date: Chaining Question: Passing errors from the updateref
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread