[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: dn aliases?

To: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@hetnet.nl>
Subject: Re: dn aliases?
From: Gavin Henry <ghenry@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:22:47 +0100
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <46E77DC5.4090809@hetnet.nl>
References: <46E465EE.9020604@scbbs.com> <46E55AEA.6060305@sys-net.it> <46E583E8.6020204@scbbs.com> <46E5A434.9080609@sys-net.it> <46E6082D.3070808@scbbs.com> <46E77DC5.4090809@hetnet.nl>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728)

 > Red Hat/FC/CentOS people should *never* build from a virgin tarball
> unless it's absolutely necessary, this statement after many years'
> experience with both methods. In 99% of all cases, rpms or srpms are
> available for all the above platforms.
> 

Well, unless they know what they are doing ;-)


-- 
Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry.
OpenLDAP Engineering Team.

E ghenry@OpenLDAP.org

Community developed LDAP software.

http://www.openldap.org/project/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dn aliases?
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@hetnet.nl>

References:
- dn aliases?
  - From: Ron Parker <sysop@scbbs.com>
- Re: dn aliases?
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: dn aliases?
  - From: Ron Parker <sysop@scbbs.com>
- Re: dn aliases?
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: dn aliases?
  - From: Ron Parker <sysop@scbbs.com>
- Re: dn aliases?
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@hetnet.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: alock package is unstable
Next by Date: Re: dn aliases?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread