[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Performance issue with In-Memory BDB
Patches should be submitted using the ITS <http://www.openldap.org/its/>.
In any case, you should definitely patch HEAD code, as 2.3.35 is months
old and in a long ago feature-frozen development branch, the current being
2.4.
I'll note that having the database in memory is an improper use, since it
breaks data persistency. So it should at least be a configure and not a
build option.
p.
> Sorry, but I could not understand the meaning of back-bdb residing in
> HEAD.
>
> I have attached a diff over openldap-2.3.35 for changes regarding BDB
> in-memory.
> This mainly has changes for keeping logs,environment and databases in
> memory.
> The bdb in-memory code is under #ifdef BDB_INMEMORY
>
> I am trying out different environment cache sizes to check any
> performance
> difference.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
Office: +39 02 23998309
Mobile: +39 333 4963172
Email: pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it
---------------------------------------