[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: information regarding rfc

To: arunachalamp@huawei.com
Subject: Re: information regarding rfc
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:16:57 +0200
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <001f01c7dcd1$bdc8fd90$5219120a@china.huawei.com>
References: <001f01c7dcd1$bdc8fd90$5219120a@china.huawei.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070802 SeaMonkey/1.1.4

Arunachalam Parthasarathy wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the reply. Actually many of the third party client like
> jxplorer says, they are complying to RFC 2251. With respect to that i
> was asking the above question, because of this difference, will there be
> any problems. Anyways I will check the exact differences between these
> RFCs (2251 and 4511) and get back. Thanks once again.

RFC 4511 ff is simply a newer revision of RFC 2251 ff. The goal of the
IETF-LDAPBIS WG to produce a new set of LDAPv3 RFCs to clarify
misunderstandings caused by the older RFCs without changing LDAPv3 at
all and without affecting older LDAP implementations.

Ciao, Michael.

References:
- RE: information regarding rfc
  - From: Arunachalam Parthasarathy <arunachalamp@huawei.com>

Prev by Date: Re: preserve value order with referential integrity overlay?
Next by Date: Re: High availability
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread