[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: performance tuning

To: Jason Peters <jlpeters@ispalliance.net>, openldap-software@openldap.org
Subject: Re: performance tuning
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:06:35 -0700
Cc: Rob Wynne <rtw@ispalliance.net>, Scott Helms <khelms@zcorum.com>
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <468D5557.4010802@ispalliance.net>
References: <468D4D2F.30602@ispalliance.net> <6AB42C92ABBF5E5E235ABB23@[192.168.1.3]> <468D5557.4010802@ispalliance.net>

--On Thursday, July 05, 2007 4:32 PM -0400 Jason Peters <jlpeters@ispalliance.net> wrote:

Yes, ultimately this will be used in a web-based application, and that's
why we
are using a cgi script to test. Is this a bad idea? should I be directly
testing the
OpenLDAP server?

If you want to know how the *ldap* server is performing, then yes, you need to test the LDAP server. Then work on testing via the web.

It is using back_bdb. I have removed the dbcachesize parameter.


I suggest reading the OpenLDAP FAQ on tuning DB_CONFIG for BDB.

--Quanah


--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

Follow-Ups:
- Re: performance tuning
  - From: "Gavin Henry" <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>

References:
- performance tuning
  - From: Jason Peters <jlpeters@ispalliance.net>
- Re: performance tuning
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: performance tuning
  - From: Jason Peters <jlpeters@ispalliance.net>

Prev by Date: Re: performance tuning
Next by Date: after openldap install
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread