Re: regarding backsql performance

[gonzales@linuxlouis.net]

That's funny that you would ask that, seeing as how the initial statements 
had no such quantification either... did I make my point?


On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:

> gonzales@linuxlouis.net wrote:
> > This is so loaded.  Postgresql is entirely configurable and in the long
> > run, when you're dealing with hundred's of thousands of records,
> > postgresql is going to out perform any local text based db file.
> >
> > If you're postgresql database system is configured correctly you'll see
> > no difference with small amounts of records between the two methods,
> > it's when your data becomes significantly large, that postgresql will
> > blow away the local db file.
>
> Do you have any figures (e.g. fair benchmarks) to support your words?
> Do you have any direct experience on the topic, or are you just
> reporting boatos?
>
> p.
>
>
>
> Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
> OpenLDAP Core Team
>
> SysNet s.r.l.
> via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
> http://www.sys-net.it
> ---------------------------------------
> Office:  +39 02 23998309
> Mobile:  +39 333 4963172
> Email:   pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it
> ---------------------------------------

--
Louis Gonzales
louis.gonzales@linuxlouis.net
http://www.linuxlouis.net